Monthly Archives: August 2012

Headline Highlights: Week of August 18th, 2012

 

Newspaper
Newspaper (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

I link these articles here because I believe the issues are important for Christians to be mindful of and to carefully weigh out.  Some articles are of a controversial nature, and their inclusion here does not necessarily express my agreement with either the political or theological views of the source.  I simply find these articles worth discussing and bringing to the attention of my fellow believers (or worth reminding about).

Ephesians 6:12: For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.

Romans 12:18: If possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all.

As Christians, we absolutely MUST remember these verses as we weigh out our positions on moral-civil issues and then seek to enact and support laws, policies and practices in society that reflect our positions.  It is not the people who disagree with us that we “fight” against, but the devil behind them (whether or not they are aware of it).  Because the second greatest commandment is to love our neighbors, we must extend a Christian grace even to those with whom we disagree.  When we fail to extend such a grace, we fail as credible ambassadors of Christ.

Issue 1:  Inciting Bible Study:

Desiring GodAll Scripture Is Breathed Out by God, Continue in It:  This is an excellent message on the authority of Scripture, and also has some tie-in with the Issue 2, below.

Desiring GodThe Shelf Life on Preaching the Gospel to Yourself:

John 5 shows the folly of fixing on the Scriptures while ignoring the God of grace. Jesus crossed paths with a troop who liked to think of themselves as soaked in the Scriptures, but they were getting them all wrong, taking them in through the wrong grid. What an epic tragedy: They had God himself in the flesh, standing in their very midst, and they missed him because their Bible reading was going awry with self at the center.

Jesus says to them, “You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is they that bear witness about me, yet you refuse to come to me that you may have life” (John 5:39–40). The lesson for us is to never disconnect our searching of the Scriptures from a conscious awareness and pursuit of Jesus as our Savior, Lord, and Treasure. The gospel of Jesus is the core, culmination, and meaning of the Scriptures. No matter how passionate the study, regular Bible intake that is not in accord with the truth of the gospel becomes zeal without knowledge.

Displace the gospel from the center, and studiousness with the Scriptures soon becomes a massive self-salvation project.

Issue 2:  Degrading Church Leadership:  There are two primary dimensions in which I see this happening on the macro scale, one is the egalitarian view that allows women to become the heads of a church body, and one is the condoning of open sexual immorality by church leaders.  The condoning of open sin is the simpler issue to handle, it just shouldn’t happen.  But the egalitarianism vs. complementarianism issue needs a more careful address than that (the TGC video linked below does an excellent job).  First, it is important to clarify that complementarianism is not the “traditional” approach to headship and submission that egalitarians and feminists characterize it as.  Complementarianism is the historically traditional approach, but egalitarians and feminists will most often approach the issue in a way that only casts it in light of the abuses and wrongs done under it – much like characterizing all of Christianity by the abuses, wrongs, and brutality that happened during the Crusades.  It is also helpful to distinguish between men from boys and women from girls (basically, distinguish adults from children, for both genders).

In the marriage and theological (teaching) dimensions of life, men have explicit  biblical headship over everyone (women and children).  Also in the marriage and theological dimension, women have headship over children.  The 5th commandment is to honor your father and mother (Exodus 20:12), and Timothy had learned his faith from his mother and grandmother (2 Timothy 1:5).  It’s not explicitly stated, but I think that it’s safe to pull out the principle that if a godly woman is old enough to be a mother or grandmother to a young man, that she can rebuke him if there is a biblically valid reason, even though she has no explicit headship over him.  Frankly, if you’re a physically mature male, but morally and theologically immature, then you’re still a boy, and you have no headship whatsoever, over anyone.  Mark Driscoll would call you – and I would agree with him – a boy who can shave (thank you, Pastor Mark, for that very helpful term).

I have no particular objection to women having headship over men in an administrative or civic capacity, until her administrative or civic authority bleeds over into a theological issue, then her headship runs out.  I have no objection to my wife being in charge of my to-do list (mainly because if I’m in charge of it, nothing will get done), but I speak for my house on theological issues – even if my wife disagrees with me (which she very rarely does, and when she does disagree, it’s discussed in private).

Associated Baptist Press: Baptist Women Pastors Reach Milestone:

The Gospel Coalition: Why is TGC Complementarian?

The Gospel Coalition: To my Egalitarian Friends and What’s Wrong With Patriarchy?

Christianity TodayAre Women Happy At Church? Nearly 75% Say Yes, Yet Feel Guilty:

Barna GroupChristian Women Today, Part 1 of 4:

Christianity TodayCanada’s Largest Protestant Church Elects Openly Gay Leader:  Homosexuality is not some especially depraved sin or brand of sexual immorality, it is just another type of sexual immorality.  The biblical inconsistency of churches like this one is demonstrated in their (sinful) condoning of open homosexuality, but their (correct) disdain for open adultery.

Issue 3:  Intolerance of Orthodox Christianity:

Christianity TodayFamily Research Council Points to Southern Poverty Law Center in Sparking Shooter’s Reaction:

Some good news: Christianity Today:  InterVarsity Re-Instated As New York University Decides Leadership Policy Is “Common Sense, Not Discrimination”

Issue 4: Voting by Faith:  What is the role of our faith in our vote?  I have said before that morality can come from nearly any religion, even though salvation only comes from one.  Even though I do not agree with the theology of either of our main presidential candidates (or vice presidential candidates, for that matter), there is one with whom I share more ideas about morality than the other.

The Resurgence: Politics and the Kingdom of God:  The last two sentences summarize the whole article, and make a strong case for balanced thought and careful discernment.

Those who act as though politics are the primary way God has determined to bring about the kingdom of God will inevitably downplay the significance of the church as God’s agent through which the Spirit works in the world. On the other hand, those who avoid all political or cultural involvement as inherently evil will miss or downplay the social and cultural ramifications of the gospel of Jesus.

The All of Life series from which this article comes is also a worthwhile read, though it doesn’t focus entirely on Christian political engagement.

Associated Baptist PressAnalyst says Romney plays religion card:

Pew Research Center: Religion & Politics 2012:

Christianity TodayPresident Obama’s Faith Council Focuses On Human Trafficking:

http://www.barna.org/culture-articles/579-christian-women-today-part-1-of-4-what-women-think-of-faith-leadership-and-their-role-in-the-church

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Headline Highlights, Politics

Showing up

Exodus 19:7-25 with notes from the Reformation Study Bible and Faithlife Study Bible.

After being reminded of God’s call and plan for Israel.  Moses is told that God is “coming… in a thick cloud, that the people may hear when I speak with you, and may also believe you forever.”  Then God tells Moses to get the people ready for something big.  They have to go through their ceremonial washing of themselves and their clothes, abstain from sex, and build a fence at the base of the mountain.  No one is allowed to cross that fence without specific direction from God, on the penalty of death.  All that Israel knows is that God would be here in three days to do something significant, but they don’t know what exactly, all they know is “get ready.”  Centuries later, John the Baptist would be telling Israel to “get ready,” and in fact he would tell them to repent and be baptized (which would have been understood as a variation on ceremonial washing) (Matthew 3).  Here in Exodus 19, Moses is preparing Israel for the introduction of God’s Law, the first purpose of which is to point us to God by contrasting our depravity with His Holiness (See The Threefold Use of the Law from R.C. Sproul’s Essential Truths).  In Matthew 3, John would be preparing Israel for the introduction of God’s Kingdom through the coming of the Messiah, whose purpose was to restore the possibility fellowship between depraved humanity and Holy God.

After the preparation, God comes, just as promised.  God shows up at Mount Sinai in an undeniably miraculous way.  Jesus shows up to be our Savior from the penalty of our sin.  But presumably, some in Israel still doubted.  After God showed up at Sinai in fire, smoke, an earth quake, and thunder all at once; and after Moses had gone up the mountain to hear from God, he still had to go back down the mountain to remind the people that this was no joke, they really did have to stay off the Mountain.  Many in Jesus’ Israel denied and doubted that he was the Messiah, because even after God the Father showed up after Jesus’ baptism and confirmed Jesus as His Son, their anticipated picture of the Messiah wasn’t what they saw in front of them, so it just couldn’t be that the Kingdom of God was really at hand.

But it was.  After all that Israel had been through during their slavery and exodus, and after all the times that God had thoroughly proven his superiority and sovereignty over the other “gods” that were worshiped in Egypt and the neighboring pagan societies, God still showed up at Sinai in a seriously attention getting way.  After centuries of cyclic obedience and blessing, disobedience and punishment, and repentance, Jesus Christ showed up in Roman subjected Israel to bring in the Kingdom of God.

Leave a comment

Filed under Journal

A bit over a week old, but an excellent piece on the Chick-Fil-A issue as it pertains to how thoughtful Christians should probably react.

The Provocative Christian

I had a seminary professor who was what I call a true liberal. By that I mean, she really believed in and lived according to the idea that we all have the liberty to hold our own opinion of things, live by them, and express them. Our differing opinions, when shared and engaged, make us wiser and stronger. To her, disagreement was an opportunity for learning and growth. Being a true liberal she was always open to hearing what others said and even when she disagreed with them it was as a learning experience, characterized by respect in the midst of disagreement. The disagreements could at times be serious and important, from the nature of God, to the reality of the resurrection of Jesus, or even if the crucifixion was necessary for the forgiveness of sin. In a seminary those are hot topics and could at times produce a shower…

View original post 1,156 more words

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Called to God – Blessed for no Other Reason

Telephone

Exodus 19:3-6 with notes from the Reformation Study Bible and Faithlife Study Bible.

The Exodus narrative continues as Israel arrives at Mount Sinai, and God prepares the people to receive the Law (Exodus 20:1-23:19).  God’s sovereignty and power have already been demonstrated substantially to Israel by what He did to get them out of Egypt and bring them safely to Sinai – He even says, “I carried you on eagles’ wings.”  While He clearly doesn’t mean that they had traveled to Sinai in luxury, they traveled under his divine protection.  Now, after reminding them about the things they’d seen and how they’d arrived at Sinai, God says, “if you will indeed obey my voice and keep my covenant, you shall be my treasured possession among all people…”  Not unlike Jesus words in John 14:15 that if we love Him we will obey His commands.  Unfortunately, we are not unlike Israel will show themselves to be, because we also repeatedly show by our actions that we do not love God.  Fortunately for us, His love does not depend on our merit, but on His sovereign will.  Over and over again, God calls us back to Himself in a way that we cannot refuse, who can possibly refuse being released from slavery to sin?  Who can resist being kept safe in the hands of a completely sovereign God?

If we authentically love Jesus for what He has accomplished on our account, we will keep his commandments, we will obey God, and we will hear His voice (first and foremost through Scripture).  But we cannot authentically love as God loves, obey His commands, or hear His voice if we are not faithful students of Scripture.  Fortunately when Jesus said that if we love Him we’ll obey Him, He followed up with the promise of a Helper, the Holy Spirit (John 14:16).  Speaking of how the Holy Spirit helps us to understand Scripture, Joel Beeke says, “Knowledge is the soil in which the Holy Spirit sows the seed of understanding.”  Not only does the Holy Spirit help us to understand God’s expectations in the first place, but He helps us to meet them, because we are so much like Israel in that we have absolutely no power within ourselves to meet those expectations.

Israel’s covenantal obligation to God was to obey Him, and God’s promised reward for obedience was that Israel would remain under the Abrahamic blessing and become God’s “treasured possession” (v. 5).  Because we live in the Church age, that same covenantal blessings is extended to us, not because of any merit on our part, but because after God has called us to Himself, He gives us the Holy Spirit to enable us to obey Him and then receive His blessing.  We don’t receive that blessing because we deserve it, and we don’t receive it only for the benefit of the Holy Spirit’s help, but because God called us in the first place.  Going back to when God called Abraham (Genesis 12), God could have just as easily called Abraham’s father Terah, or his brother Haran.  But God, in His own sovereign pleasure, picked Abram to call out of his homeland, and to bless.  God picked Isaac, rather than Ishmael, to carry on his father’s blessing.  God picked Jacob, rather than Esau, to carry his grandfather’s blessing.  And on down the line until the nation of Israel is called to God out of Egypt, and out of all the rest of the world that God had made and that belongs to Him anyway.

We are blessed, as Israel was, for no other reason than that God called us out of the world, and out of our slavery to sin.  Why Israel and not the rest of the world?  Why the Church and not the rest of the world?  We don’t know.  But we do know that God’s thoughts and ways are not ours, and that His are higher than ours (Isaiah 55).

Related books

1 Comment

Filed under Doctrine, Journal

Headline Highlights: Week of August 10th, 2012

Highlights are back, but being reduced to a once-a-week frequency to help balance other responsibilities.  Enjoy.
Newspaper
Newspaper (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

I link these articles here because I believe the issues are important for Christians to be mindful of and to carefully weigh out.  Some articles are of a controversial nature, and their inclusion here does not necessarily express my agreement with either the political or theological views of the source.  I simply find these articles worth discussing and bringing to the attention of my fellow believers (or worth reminding about).

Ephesians 6:12: For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.

Romans 12:18: If possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all.

As Christians, we absolutely MUST remember these verses as we weigh out our positions on moral-civil issues and then seek to enact and support laws, policies and practices in society that reflect our positions.  It is not the people who disagree with us that we “fight” against, but the devil behind them (whether or not they are aware of it).  Because the second greatest commandment is to love our neighbors, we must extend a Christian grace even to those with whom we disagree.  When we fail to extend such a grace, we fail as credible ambassadors of Christ.

Issue 1: A Trending Lack of Discernment:  “Knowledge is the soil in which the Holy Spirit sows the seed of understanding” (modified from this article).  There is a tragic illiteracy of Scripture among modern Western Christians, and that illiteracy and lack of knowledge is growing into a possibly more tragic lack of understanding of, and discernment between, false teachings or sound doctrine.  This lack of discernment also plays into how we will (or won’t) respond to the other two issues in this Highlights post.

Ligonier: Where East Meets WestDesiring God: Fight the Poverty of Attention and Do We Ignore the Bible.

Issue 2:  Religious Liberty vs. “Discrimination” based on Homosexuality (or other sin issue):  Chick-fil-A aside, “tolerance” vs. Religious Liberty and Christian Morals remains a prevalent issue in current events.  Conservative Christians are castigated by the political (and religious) left because of a firm belief that homosexuality is outside of God’s design and morally wrong.  The hypocrisy in some Christian groups is that they lack of grace towards this particular sexual sin, while silently condoning or not actively fighting other sexual sin within their congregation.  The hypocrisy of the far left is their “tolerance” of everyone but Conservative Christians, and it is particularly ironic with regards to this issue because they are “tolerant” of Conservative Muslims, who are violently anti-homosexual (in nations where Sharia law is in place and enforce, homosexuality is a capital crime punished by death).

World MagazinePhilosophical Differences and Vanderbilt Squeeze:
Excerpt from Philosophical Differences: “A sharp-eyed reader [of the average anti-discrimination policy] will grasp both the central issue and the embedded fallacy. The issue: An institution (such as a Christian college) that refuses hiring on the basis of homosexual practice is thereby discriminatory. The fallacy: If a non-discrimination policy includes religion in its list of protected categories, then any institution religiously opposed to hiring a [person practicing a lifestyle contrary to the institution’s beliefs] is itself discriminated against…”

Desiring GodNot Your Mother’s Kind of Tolerance and No One is More Tolerant Than God:

A strongly recommended book for this discussion: D.A. Carson, Intolerance of Tolerance.

Issue 3:  Systemic Academic Antagonism of Christianity:  This issue is more of the same lack of “tolerance” for Christians, but in a more narrow scope than the above issue.  I also have personal experience on the untolerated end  of this particular issue, which I may write about later.

World Magazine: Soaping the Slippery Slope, Into Exile, Good Deeds Punished, and Vanderbilt Squeeze:

On a brighter note… Christianity TodayMissouri Students Can Now Opt Out of School Assignments on Religious Grounds:

Related articles

Authors, Share Your Book with Millions of Readers

1 Comment

Filed under Headline Highlights, Politics

A Family Reunion, and a Father-in-law’s Advice

 

Gavel & Stryker

Gavel & Stryker (Photo credit: KeithBurtis)

Exodus 18 with notes from the Reformation Study Bible.

Apparently Moses had sent his wife and boys back home while he was dealing with Pharaoh and getting Israel out of Egypt.  Now that Israel is on its way to Sinai, and news has reached Jethro (Moses’ Father-in-law), Jethro brings Moses’ family back to him.  In Exodus 18:1-12 there is a lot going on, there’s a family reunion, a time of story telling and testimony that is centered on God (compare that to the non-God-centered story telling in Genesis 47:7-10) .  Since Jethro is a priest of Midian, and Midian is a descendant of Abraham (Genesis 25:2), it is possible that Jethro also followed Yahweh, although we don’t know this for certain.  So this story telling time might serve as either a strengthening of Jethro’s faith, or a conversion from a pagan faith to following Yahweh.

But the next day is also very interesting.  Because Moses was playing the role of a legal and spiritual mediator to an entire nation, and trying to do so within his human limitations.  He was mediating legally between individuals within the nation, and spiritually between the nation and God.  The two roles individually are far outside the realm of human capacity, but Moses was trying to do them both.  We’re not told if he was succeeding (even temporarily) or if he was failing in the performance of these roles, but from Jethro’s strong reaction, it’s pretty clear that Moses, like many modern jack-of-all-trades pastors, was on a path to burn-out.  He had to delegate his civil role while maintaining his spiritual role.  This is not much different from the apostles delegating the care and feeding of widows in Acts 6 to deacons so that they (the apostles) could focus on teaching the Gospel.

While pastors today still play an important role in making known to us the statutes and laws of God, as Moses did for Israel (Exodus 18:16), our only remaining spiritual mediator is now Jesus Christ himself (1 Timothy 2:5; Hebrews 9:15, 12:24).  We don’t have to wait in line in a spiritual court room.  We read the Bible to hear from God the Father regarding Jesus Christ, we pray to and in the name of Jesus Christ, and the answer (should we have the sensitivity to “hear” it, and the discernment to validate it with Scripture) comes from the Holy Spirit.

See Also:  Timothy Lovegrove on Exodus 18

 

2 Comments

Filed under Journal

Deliverance, Remembrance, Complacence

Exodus 13-17 with notes from the Reformation Study Bible and Faithlife Study Bible.

There is a pattern in the lives of many Christians – including myself – to become complacent and to not recognize or remember the works and mercies of God in times when things are going well for us.  A consequence of this pattern is that when things start to go bad, we go running back to God with an intense sense of urgency and a need for him to act.  Sometimes we do this “running back” in a way that fails to recognize past deliverances.  In this section of Exodus we see the start of Israel’s wilderness wanderings and the start of this cycle of deliverance, remembrance, and complacence.

Immediately on the heels of the Passover and the Exodus, God, through Moses, directs a means of remembering his deliverance from the slavery of Egypt through the plagues (from which Israel was spared).  Israel is to have an annual weeklong party to commemorate the Exodus, and is to consecrate (or wash and set apart) their firstborn sons for religious service.  There is even a mechanism for passing this memory down through the generations.  As adult Israelites perform the rituals and sacrifices prescribed by the law, their curious children will ask “why?”  The parent is then to respond with the reason for their actions and a description of the events that the ritual commemorates.  In our own day, this would be Christmas, Easter, baptism, and communion; the Christian holidays and ordinances.

Christmas and Easter both happen once a year, to celebrate the birth, death, and victorious resurrection of Jesus Christ.  The ordinances are performed frequently and as-needed, and both point to Jesus’ death and resurrection.  We have our holidays, we celebrate the ordinances, all of which point us to the actions of Christ.  God has literally done miracles to deliver us.  Still we question God and whine and grumble and scream “why did you bring me here?” when we come under spiritual attack (like Pharaoh’s host pursuing Israel), or when we don’t see how God is meeting – or is going to meet – our needs in a given situation (like Israel at Marah and enroute to Sinai).

Because of Jesus’ death and resurrection, our deliverance is certain.  Because of his love, our sustenance (though not necessarily comfort or prosperity) is assured.  So why do we whine and grumble?  I think there is one reason.  Or, at least, there only one reason that I whine and grumble.  Pride.  Because I am young, healthy, strong, moderately intelligent, and a quick learner, I constantly struggle with pride, and I like to do things on my own without other people’s help.  Often, in my sinful nature, I try to face challenges that God has placed before me on my own.  But God doesn’t challenge me so that my own strength and merit and abilities can get credit for beating the challenge – or even so that my faith can get credit.  God challenges me (as he challenged Israel) so that he can be the hero, so that he can be the cavalry galloping in at the critical moment.  Does that mean that God is egotistical?  Yes and no.  Yes, because it is “egotistical” to be such a glory hog; but no, because HE IS GOD!  He makes the rules, not me.  He is perfect and sinless, so there is nothing wrong with drawing attention to that!  I am a depraved, prideful wretch (apart from his sovereign, saving, and sanctifying grace), and there is everything wrong with drawing attention to myself, because there is nothing worth copying, save only when I point others to God through Jesus Christ.

I suppose another reason for the whining and complaining might be forgetfulness, but I think that issue also ties back to pride.  We forget because during the holidays we allow ourselves to be less concerned with the purpose of the holidays (remembering Christ) and more concerned with the trappings of the holidays – be they gifts, decorations, family gatherings, social gatherings, candy – or focus on those things is out of our desire to satisfy ourselves and to impress others, which is pride.  We forget because we allow the ordinances to become routine, we participate out of social compliance or muscle memory, but our minds wander to what we’ll have for lunch or to what projects we’ll be working on that afternoon.  We forget because we relegate the thorough study of scripture to clergy and scholars, because we prefer our own goals and desires over God’s desire that we know him.  To many of us – including me at times – we pridefully prioritize working to pay the bills over reading the bible, or going to school to get a better job to work less and pay bigger bills over going to a bible study group, or ____ instead of reading a commentary (yes, there are easy ones out there).  We fail to make use of the wealth of resources at our fingertips because we “just don’t have time.”

The more often we “just don’t have time” for getting to know God, the more often we find ourselves acting like Israel in the face of spiritual and personal challenges instead of James, who admonished us to “consider it joy” (James 1:2).  That joy resulting from anticipating the coming sanctification, which is an act of God that glorifies God in and as a result of that trial.

2 Comments

Filed under Journal

My God can beat your god.

Exodus 7-12 with notes from the Reformation Study Bible.

Only the youngest Christians have neither heard, nor asked the question, “why do bad things happen?”  But even the youngest Christians, or at least the children of Christians in Sunday School, have heard this story.  The story of God vs. Egypt, with the purpose of redeeming Israel out of its 430 year slavery.  I believe that if Christians remembered this story as adults, they might have a better answer to the above question and related ones that follow it.  You might say, “wait, Pharaoh and the Egyptians are the bad guys in this story, they deserved it.”  I’m not so sure.  In this story, if we’re paying close attention, God sovereignly selected who the good guys and bad guys were, and he himself was the hero.

In our modern western mind, slavery is one of the most deeply repugnant offenses against humanity, but in the time in which this story occurs, it was normal practice.  Slavery was not yet considered immoral, even within the culture of God’s chosen people, and the Mosaic Laws that addressed slave ownership were not yet written.  In the standards of the day, there was nothing immoral or sinful about Pharaoh and Egypt enslaving Israel.  One later theme in Exodus is Israel’s complaining about its unpleasant circumstances in the wilderness, and preferring instead the slavery in Egypt.  No matter how bad the slavery in Egypt actually was, Israel’s memory of it seemed to be preferable to life in the wilderness.  Even though Pharaoh was certainly not one of God’s people, or even a convert, he wasn’t a bad person by the standards of the day.  He and many of the Egyptian people were exactly the types of folks for whom people today would ask “If God is loving, then why do bad things happen to ‘good’ people?”

One response is focused on the nature of the people, a pastor or thoughtful Christian might respond to that question with another, “‘good’ by whose standards?”  They would then proceed to talk about sin and the contrast of man’s sinful nature with the Holy nature of God.  That’s a good answer to start with, but I don’t think that it’s a complete answer.  I think that a better answer would focus on God’s nature first, then deal with human nature.  God is certainly loving, or else we would not have the hope offered in the Gospel, and scriptures whose primary purpose is to teach the Gospel.  But God is also sovereign.  Five times in the stories of the plagues, God proclaims “I am the LORD” (7:5, 7:17, 8:22, 10:2, 12:12).  What proceeds those statements is an explanation that the purpose for what is happening is so that the world, Egypt, and Israel will all know beyond doubt that Yahweh is the LORD, and there is none like him.

Not only are the plagues collectively brought on Egypt as a part of God’s plan to demonstrate his sovereignty, but several of the plagues also assault the Egyptian religious system.  The first plague of turning the Nile river system into blood showed Yahweh’s supremacy over the Nile god.  Through the frog infestation, the LORD demonstrated his superiority over the Egyptian goddess Heket.  From the statement in 8:26 that “… the offerings that we shall sacrifice to the LORD our God are abominable to the Egyptians,” we get the idea that it was offensive to the Egyptians to sacrifice certain animals because they deified those animals.  In the fifth plague, the death of the Egyptian livestock, we can be at least confident, if not certain, that some of the deified animals died – by which God again rose above the Egyptian gods.  In the ninth plague of darkness, God beat Ra, the Egyptian sun god.

Add to all of this, that the very word that we read as “plague,” מגּפה (maggêphâh), can potentially also be translated as “stroke,” “strike,” or “beat [down].”  The idea is clear that the LORD God was laying a literal smack-down on Egypt for his own sovereign purpose of being known and acknowledged as God, even though Egypt had done nothing wrong by the moral standard of the day.  It is tempting to object and say that God was being egotistical to force the world into recognizing him in such a way.  Which is absolutely, one hundred percent true.  God was being egotistical, and is egotistical even today when he brings calamity (or has mercy) on whomever he will so that he will be seen as God.  But God is the only entity for whom pride is not a sin.  It is perfectly ok, acceptable, and in fact HOLY for God to show such pride.

Related Posts:
We can’t get off the hook (Exodus 3-6)

See also:

Desiring God: 10 Reasons You Should Read the Book of Job

Leave a comment

Filed under Journal

We can’t get off the hook.

Exodus 3-6 with notes from the Reformation Study Bible.

We aren’t let off the hook when God has a plan for us.  In this section of Exodus, Moses tries to make excuses about why he won’t be successful in doing the thing that God is sending him to do, or why he isn’t qualified.  Moses knows that it won’t be easy, but that the task is necessary.  Much like Christ knew that going to the cross wouldn’t be easy, but that it was necessary, and was reluctant to do it.  Even Christ – or at least the human part of him – pleaded with God to let him off the hook.  But God’s ultimate plan and promise to Israel was fulfilled in part by Moses eventually being obedient and going back to Egypt, just as God’s ultimate plan to redeem his elect was ultimately and finally fulfilled by Christ going to the Cross.

Moses silliest excuse for why he won’t be successful is “Well, God, I don’t know your name, so I can’t tell Pharaoh or Israel who sent me, and since I can’t tell them who sent me, they won’t listen to me.”  God smacks down that objection with “sure you do, tell them I AM sent you… tell them Yahweh sent you.”  I AM and Yahweh are both packed with meanings that point to God’s self-existence and ultimate sovereignty over everything in creation – including Egypt, Israel, Pharaoh, and Moses.  Moses didn’t go to Egypt to demand the freedom of God’s people under his own authority, like when he killed the Egyptian for beating one of the Hebrews, this time he acted with the authority of THE LORD.  Jesus of Nazareth wasn’t just a nice guy that came to earth to shake things up just because he felt like it, he was Jesus the Christ, the anointed one, come under the authority of God the Father to redeem his elect.

Moses was given miraculous signs to show to Pharaoh and Israel to authenticate his God-given authority.  Even after that, Moses still tried to get off the hook and hang the possible success of the whole plan on his own qualifications, and he was indeed utterly unqualified for his task.  He was a stuttering escaped convict, and a coward, that God later raised up to become Israel’s law giver.  Christ also did miracles to authenticate his authority.  But Jesus, unlike Moses, was fully and completely qualified for his task, and despite his fear of it, he did it.

God had a plan, Moses had excuses.  God didn’t let Moses off the hook, so Moses went to Egypt.  God had a plan, Christ had a humanly understandable fear of the cross.  God didn’t let himself of the hook – he didn’t let Jesus Christ (God incarnate) off the hook, so Christ went to the cross.

Once Moses and Aaron arrived in Egypt and had their first conversations with Israel’s elders and with Pharaoh, things didn’t go according to the human plan, even though God had told them what to expect.  God then reassured them that everything would work out just fine.  God has given us his plan and his reassurance in Scripture.  We’ll undoubtedly be much better prepared to face life’s challenges by exploring and endeavoring to understand God’s ultimate plan, and by seeking his reassurance.

3 Comments

Filed under Journal

Soli Dei Gloria

Why is the first aim of this blog to glorify God?  The simplest answer is twofold:  first, because He deserves it; second, because it will keep me humble.  Who is this God that I seek to glorify?  To answer that, here are my preparatory notes from a sermon that I gave at Parkside Church on April 29th, 2012.  The audio of this message is available here, and I welcome any constructive criticism.

Pillars of Parkside’s Practice

Soli Dei Gloria

Main Scripture: I Timothy 1:17 ESV 

To the King of the ages, immortal, invisible, the only God, be honor and glory forever and ever. Amen.

Parkside’s Statement: We believe in one God, Creator of all things, who is personal, perfect, and eternally existing in God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit.

As I mentioned two weeks ago, our core beliefs are statements of Parkside’s position on various doctrine issues.  However, this particular statement is also our statement on theology – the study of God.  This statement is very brief and simple, even though God is infinitely complex, but it provides six theological building blocks that can be used to edify our understanding of God and his character.  I’ll handle them a bit out of order, but the building blocks are these:  God is God alone, God is Creator, God is personal, God is perfect, God is eternal, and God is triune.  This is not meant to be a comprehensive list of God’s attributes – first and foremost because there is no such list – but all of the rest of God’s attributes can be accurately extrapolated from these six when guided by scripture.

God is Creator 

God built the universe under his own power and by his own will.  God made the universe ex nihilo – out of nothing.  We see this in the creation account in Genesis 1-2.  We also see God referred to as “Creator” all through scripture.

Ecclesiastes 12:1 – Remember also your Creator in the days of your youth, before the evil days come and the years draw near of which you will say, “I have no pleasure in them”;

Isaiah 40:28 – Have you not known? Have you not heard? The LORD is the everlasting God, the Creator of the ends of the earth. He does not faint or grow weary; his understanding is unsearchable.

Isaiah 43:15 – I am the LORD, your Holy One, the Creator of Israel, your King.

Romans 1:24-25 – Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen.

I Peter 4:19 – Therefore let those who suffer according to God’s will entrust their souls to a faithful Creator while doing good.

Scripture is explicitly clear that God is our Creator.  Christians frequently come into conflict with scientists on this issue because of conflict between our understanding of the scriptural creation account and the way that science understands evolution.  In most cases, it is absolutely right that we firmly stand our ground on this issue, but not necessarily all the time.  Psalms 19 begins by proclaiming, “The heavens declare the glory of God, and the sky above proclaims his handiwork.”  David continues in that psalm by describing what we call general revelation – God revealing himself through his creation.  Romans 1:19-20 gives a similar message, “For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse.”  Exploration of creation – science – is a scripturally valid way to know of God, as long as we make science subordinate and subject to scripture, and not the reverse.  When I have conversations with unbelievers on this issue, I approach it by saying that Philosophy has six basic questions:  “who,” “what,” “why,” “where,” “when,” and “how.”  Science can only answer four of those questions, but it cannot answer the “who” or “why” questions.

As science explores and reveals more about the “what,” “where,” “when,” and “how” answers, we must remain ready to give an answer for our faith and hope – and to do so with gentleness and respect.  If we close our minds and ears to learning and hearing about new scientific discoveries, then we close lock the gates to an extremely important mission field.  We also need to take it on faith that God will eventually reconcile scientific understanding with his word, and it may not happen in our lifetime.  For the sake of brevity, I won’t spend any more time on that topic today.  However, if this issue has been an obstacle for your own faith, or you frequently find yourself wishing you knew more on the subject, I would strongly encourage you to check out Mark Driscoll’s article Answers to Common Questions about Creation, and the corresponding list of resources that he has put together for that topic. 

God is Triune 

This is the toughest one for me personally to wrap my head around.  It is not a teaching that 1+1+1=1, and it is also not tritheism – teaching that there are three little gods that are buddies working together in the big God club[i].  God is one God, simultaneously manifested in three distinct persons.  This is immensely difficult for our human minds to grasp.  However, we must accept it because it is clearly taught in scripture.

Matthew 3:16-17 – And when Jesus was baptized, immediately he went up from the water, and behold, the heavens were opened to him, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and coming to rest on him; and behold, a voice from heaven said, “This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased.”

Matthew 28:19 – Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,

I Peter 1:1-2 – Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, To those who are elect exiles of the Dispersion in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, in the sanctification of the Spirit, for obedience to Jesus Christ and for sprinkling with his blood: May grace and peace be multiplied to you.

The most helpful illustration for me to understand this is marriage – if the marriage relationship were considered a distinct being from the bride and groom – which it isn’t, but remember, this is only an illustration.  The husband and wife are distinct people, with distinct roles, but there is only one marriage, and it contains both the husband and wife.  There is an amazing sermon by Bruce Ware on this topic, called “How the Trinity Relates to Marriage.”  It’s pretty long – an hour and thirteen minutes, but it is worth every second – both for your understanding of the trinity and for understanding biblical marriage.  I personally am not a fan of the illustration of one man being simultaneously a son, husband, and father, because it seems to be toeing the line on a heresy called Modalism – a teaching that the persons in the trinity are different ways that God expresses himself at different times to different people.  Modalism is a heresy because it denies distinct roles performed by distinct persons within the Godhead.

Dr. R.C. Sproul (senior) insists that his students be able to make distinctions between contradiction, paradox, and mystery.[ii]  The rule of contradiction, as defined by Aristotle, is the rule something cannot be what it is and not be what it is at the same time in the same relationship.  So “a” cannot be “a” and “not a” at the same time.  I cannot simultaneously be a husband and a bachelor.  Paradox is a situation when something seems like something else until it is placed alongside that something else.  My brothers and I look similar enough that if you saw us separately you might call us by the wrong name, but if you see us together you can see the differences.  Mystery is fact beyond the capacity of understanding.  The law of relativity would be a mystery to most first graders, but God was (and still is) a mystery even for Einstein.  The doctrine of the trinity is a certainly a mystery, but it is absolutely not a contradiction, though it may appear so when you are first exposed to it.

God is God Alone
(and is therefore sovereign, omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient)

God is the supreme and final authority in the universe.  There is no one and nothing higher than him.  Because God is God Alone, he must be sovereign over the entire universe, or else there would be some other authority in the universe besides him.  Because he is sovereign, he must be omnipotent, omnipresent, and omniscient, because if he were not those things than there would be either something, some place, or some issue over which God was not sovereign.

Exodus 20:2-6 – I am the LORD your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery. You shall have no other gods before me. You shall not make for yourself a carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. You shall not bow down to them or serve them, for I the LORD your God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and the fourth generation of those who hate me, but showing steadfast love to thousands of those who love me and keep my commandments.

Psalms 115:3 – Our God is in the heavens; he does all that he pleases.

Proverbs 16:4 – The LORD has made everything for its purpose, even the wicked for the day of trouble.

Isaiah 40:13-14 – Who has measured the Spirit of the LORD, or what man shows him his counsel? Whom did he consult, and who made him understand? Who taught him the path of justice, and taught him knowledge, and showed him the way of understanding?

Isaiah 46:8-10 – Remember this and stand firm, recall it to mind, you transgressors, remember the former things of old; for I am God, and there is no other; I am God, and there is none like me, declaring the end from the beginning and from ancient times things not yet done, saying, ‘My counsel shall stand, and I will accomplish all my purpose,’

Isaiah 55:8-9 – For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, declares the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts.

Jeremiah 10:10 – But the LORD is the true God; he is the living God and the everlasting King. At his wrath the earth quakes, and the nations cannot endure his indignation.

I Timothy 1:17 – To the King of the ages, immortal, invisible, the only God, be honor and glory forever and ever. Amen.

If God is not the sole, sovereign, independent governor of the universe, then He is not worthy to be called “God.” Critics of Christianity, and heretics within Christianity will frequently object to God’s sovereignty because it supposedly encroaches on human free will, and/or because of the existence of evil.  The critic John Stewart Mill framed an argument that essentially claimed that God is either loving but not sovereign, or sovereign but not loving. Supposedly, if God is loving, then he cannot be sovereign, because a sovereign God would prevent evil, and there is evil in the world.  The only alternative offered in Mr. Mill’s argument is that if God is sovereign, then he is not loving, because a loving God would not allow evil to exist.  Variations of this same argument might pit God’s righteousness against the existence of evil.  However, Mr. Mill has offered us what is called a false dilemma.  He has framed the argument in such a way to make us believe that there are only two options – and there are in fact more than two options.  He has also set up the options to appear as if they are mutually exclusive, when they are not mutually exclusive.

So what are the other options, and why are they not mutually exclusive?  I’ll return to that in a couple of minutes, but first I need to provide a more complete framework.

God is Eternal
(and is therefore unchanging)

If God is both eternal and sovereign, then he must be immutable – or unchanging – because if God changed, then there would be a time over which God was not sovereign.  A.W. Tozer was a well-known Christian mystic – which in this sense does not mean that he was superstitious, but that he was an explorer of biblical mystery.  Regarding God’s immutability, he said, “For a moral being to change it would be necessary that the change be in one of three directions.  He must go from better to worse or from worse to better; or, granted that the moral quality remain stable, he must change within himself, as from immature to mature or from one order of being to another. …  All that God is He has always be, and all that He has been and is He will ever be. … In God no change is possible; in men change is impossible to escape. … In coming to Him at any time we need not wonder whether we shall find Him in a receptive mood.”[iii]  God’s attributes do not change, nor does his character, and nor does his will.  If God did change, or went through mood swings, then the entire endeavor of the Christian faith would be utterly pointless.

Deuteronomy 33:27 – The eternal God is your dwelling place, and underneath are the everlasting arms… 

Psalms 33:11 – The counsel of the LORD stands forever, the plans of his heart to all generations.

Psalms 90:2 – Before the mountains were brought forth, or ever you had formed the earth and the world, from everlasting to everlasting you are God. 

Psalms 102:24-27 – “O my God,” I say, “take me not away in the midst of my days— you whose years endure throughout all generations!” Of old you laid the foundation of the earth, and the heavens are the work of your hands.  They will perish, but you will remain; they will all wear out like a garment. You will change them like a robe, and they will pass away, but you are the same, and your years have no end.

Isaiah 46:8-10 – “Remember this and stand firm, recall it to mind, you transgressors, remember the former things of old; for I am God, and there is no other; I am God, and there is none like me, declaring the end from the beginning and from ancient times things not yet done, saying, ‘My counsel shall stand, and I will accomplish all my purpose,’…” 

Malachi 3:6 – For I the LORD do not change…

I Timothy 1:17 – To the King of the ages, immortal, invisible, the only God, be honor and glory forever and ever. Amen.

Hebrews 13:8 – Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever. 

God is Personal

(and therefore embodies love, and is loving) 

All through scripture, we read personal pronouns used for God.  ‘He,’ ‘Him,’ and ‘His’ are all pronouns used to describe or reference God.  ‘Father,’ ‘King,’ ‘Lord,’ and ‘Master,’ are all words describing personal human relationships to an authority figure, they are also words that are used in scripture to help us understand our relationship with him.  We are told to pray to God and to read his word, this constitutes our conversation with him.  Scripture also teaches a great deal about God’s love for us, and a relationship of love is the highest interpersonal relationship we can have.

Another quote from Tozer:

From God’s other known attributes we may learn much about His love.  We can know, for instance, that because God is self-existent, his love had no beginning; because He is eternal, His love can have no end; because He is infinite, it has no limit; because he is holy, it is the quintessence of all spotless purity; because He is immense, his love is an incomprehensibly vast, bottomless, shoreless sea before which we kneel in joyful silence and from which the loftiest eloquence retreats confused and abashed.[iv]

Because God’s love is a constant theme through all of scripture, it is difficult to choose just a few verses to support the point.  They are all important to our understanding of God and his love.  I do, however, want to bring up one verse that is frequently misused.

I John 4:8, 16 – Anyone who does not love does not know God, because God is love. … God is love, and whoever abides in love abides in God, and God abides in him.

What that verse means is that God epitomizes love; God’s character is the highest embodiment of love; that as we more understand God, we more understand love; and that as we demonstrate love to other people, we reflect God and his character.  We have to be very careful how we apply that statement that God is love.  Many heresies arise from misapplication of that statement.  One heresy is to say that because God is love, that love is God.  If that is true then whatever we fallen and depraved wretches think embodies “love” becomes an object of worship placed either above or beside God, and our tainted understanding of love becomes and idol.  Another common heresy from that statement – that is tragically common today and that many of my peers have embraced – is that because God is love he will not eternally punish sin. 

God is Perfect

(and is therefore just and righteous) 

Again, we get some useful distinctions from Dr. Sproul.  Justice means to give what is due, biblical justice is to do what is right, injustice is an opposite of justice done by someone without the right to do other than justice (a vigilante, or someone other than God), and mercy is an opposite of justice done by someone with the right to do other than justice (a judge, or God)[v].  Remember as I read these verses that God is sovereign, does all that he pleases, God is not under the law, and that he is a law unto himself. 

Exodus 34:6-7 – The LORD passed before him and proclaimed, “The LORD, the LORD, a God merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and abounding in steadfast love and faithfulness, keeping steadfast love for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, but who will by no means clear the guilty, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children and the children’s children, to the third and the fourth generation.”

Nehemiah 9:32-33 – Now, therefore, our God, the great, the mighty, and the awesome God, who keeps covenant and steadfast love, let not all the hardship seem little to you that has come upon us, upon our kings, our princes, our priests, our prophets, our fathers, and all your people, since the time of the kings of Assyria until this day. Yet you have been righteous in all that has come upon us, for you have dealt faithfully and we have acted wickedly.

Psalm 25:8-10 – Good and upright is the LORD; therefore he instructs sinners in the way.  He leads the humble in what is right, and teaches the humble his way. All the paths of the LORD are steadfast love and faithfulness, for those who keep his covenant and his testimonies.

Matthew 5:48 – You therefore must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect.

Romans 3:1-6 – Then what advantage has the Jew? Or what is the value of circumcision? Much in every way. To begin with, the Jews were entrusted with the oracles of God. What if some were unfaithful? Does their faithlessness nullify the faithfulness of God? By no means! Let God be true though everyone were a liar, as it is written, “That you may be justified in your words, and prevail when you are judged.” But if our unrighteousness serves to show the righteousness of God, what shall we say? That God is unrighteous to inflict wrath on us? (I speak in a human way.) By no means! For then how could God judge the world?

Romans 9:3-20 – As it is written, “Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.” What shall we say then? Is there injustice on God’s part? By no means! For he says to Moses, “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.” So then it depends not on human will or exertion, but on God, who has mercy. For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, “For this very purpose I have raised you up, that I might show my power in you, and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth.” So then he has mercy on whomever he wills, and he hardens whomever he wills. You will say to me then, “Why does he still find fault? For who can resist his will?” But who are you, O man, to answer back to God? Will what is molded say to its molder, “Why have you made me like this?”

So now we’ll go back to John Stewart Mill’s objections.  How can God be both sovereign and loving, and there still be sin in the world?  This is where our theology – our understanding of God and his character – becomes doctrine that has application for us and how we relate to God.  The answer is partially that God’s sovereignty and God’s love are not mutually exclusive.  The other part is that God is simultaneously sovereign, loving, righteous, and just.  God’s sovereignty gives God the right to make the law, his love and righteousness necessitate that man had free will to choose sin at least at creation, God’s justice necessitates that he punish sin under the law that he defined, but also gives him the right to have mercy on whom he chooses. “[God’s] eternal decree decided not which choice [Adam] should make but that he should be free to make it.  [Humanity’s] will [was] free [at creation, before the fall] because God is sovereign.  A God less than sovereign would not bestow moral freedom upon his creatures.  He would be afraid to do so.”[vi] Humanity’s free will was exercised by Adam.  After Adam’s fall, humanity is dead in sin, its heart knows only evil, and it cannot seek God.  God is under no obligation to save anyone, he would be perfectly just to eternally damn us all if he so chose.  But fortunately, in his love, he chose to have mercy on a few.


[iii] Tozer, Aiden W.  The Knowledge of the Holy.  New York, New York: Harper Collins, 1978. 49. Print.

[iv] Tozer, Aiden W.  The Knowledge of the Holy.  New York, New York: Harper Collins, 1978. 98. Print.

[vi] Tozer, Aiden W.  The Knowledge of the Holy.  New York, New York: Harper Collins, 1978. 111. Print.

1 Comment

Filed under Doctrine